No.50941[View All]
Greenification edition
Old
>>49915 No.51871
>>51868>Retake it and this time be true! Did you take the emoji version? That probably results in more "joke" answers
No.51873
>>51872>I took the comprehensive version with 150 questions which includes emoji questionGood grief…
No.51874
>>51873>Good grief…Well!?!??!?!?
No.51875
>>51874Maybe later. Gotta set my own priorities, after all
No.51876
>>51875>Gotta set my own priorities, after allWhat does that mean for you? More masturbation?
No.51877
Ah, so "MSPA larper" does mean that we casually weave in RP, and not that we merely have pretentions of MSPA status.
But doesn't hypnotits indulge herself as well?
No.51878
>>51877NONE OF THEM TALK ABOUT HOMESTUCK. THAT'S THE THING THAT MAKES IT INSUFFERABLE. I SHOULD HONESTLY FUCKING COPY-PASTE MY RANT EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY SAY THAT SHIT.
LET ME GO FIND IT (FIND IT FOR ME.
)
>But doesn't hypnotits indulge herself as well?TWNBAW
No.51879
>>51876Not even!
I'm innocently going through my pawn screenshots to make a themed calendar for 2025
No.51880
>>51879>I'm innocently going through my pawn screenshots>innocently>pawn We both know such a thing is impossible.
No.51881
>>51878>LET ME GO FIND IT (FIND IT FOR ME.Doesn't matter, that's a week old thread.
Would you responsibly mod a more "on topic" HS board here? Or would you abuse your power…?
No.51882
>>51881>Doesn't matter, that's a week old thread.Yes, it does.
>Would you responsibly mod a more "on topic" HS board here?Yes…? I literally tried to do such a thing when shartyfags came to /co/ and Sturdy admin wouldn't let me.
>Or would you abuse your power…?No…?
No.51884
>>51882>Yes…? I literally tried to do such a thing when shartyfags came to /co/ and Sturdy admin wouldn't let me.Well, I trust you enoug. Still dunno if flimsy and /co/ hangers would bite the bait, but maybe worth a shot.
My instinct is to name it /hot/ - Homestuck On-Topic
No.51885
>>51884>Still dunno if flimsy and /co/ hangers would bite the bait, but maybe worth a shot.No, they're retarded and don't actually want constant discussion. It's fundamentally cursed.
You read what I said, right?
No.51886
>>51885>No, they're retarded and don't actually want constant discussion. It's fundamentally cursedNeither does HSG, which is why it's mostly a low-hum of references and RP, with
popping up sporadically when someone has a point to make.
I imagine a on-topic board would be on the slower side, unless NSFW art posting was encouraged
No.51887
>>51886>I imagine a on-topic board would be on the slower side, unless NSFW art posting was encouragedNo, it'd be dead because of what I already said. It'd devolve into Limbus Company and artdumping like flimsychan.
VGH HOMESTEALTH SO SVPERIOR DAVEKAT RETCON LMAO
No.51888
Tried to make the two Jenny Nicholsons talk to each other and they just perfectly synchronized. No other bot does that.
No.51890
>>51889>Leaning toward eri for the last Hazure remix*Strangles you.*
No.51891
>>51888The name being being the same probably mindbr8ks cai
>>51890That's what you yourself recommended
No.51892
>>51891>The name being being the same probably mindbr8ks caiDoesn't happen with my Rose but maybe because I hard programmed it in.
>That's what you yourself recommendedI STILL HATE YOU.
No.51894
>Jenny Nicholson just cyberbullying my OC
No.51896
>>51895Seems effective "doe"
No.51897
>>51896Effective enough to get a car overturned.
No.51898
>>51892>I STILL HATE YOU.I think I'll name it "wwizardry", and try to evoke an old Wizardry games using solid borders and main font (in eri's colors)
Headers and subtitles can be in a pottermore clone font
Perfectly slots into 'The Magician' this way as well
No.51899
>>51898>Headers and subtitles can be in a pottermore clone fontPretty sure you can find that free online.
>Perfectly slots into 'The Magician' this way as wellONEESAN ONEESAN ONEEESAN.
TAKE THE 150 VERSION INSTEAD OF COPING OUT WITH EMOJIS.
No.51900
>>51899>TAKE THE 150 VERSION INSTEAD OF COPING OUT WITH EMOJIS. I'll have gpt answer for me
Biznasty on my composite, that might be more cooly analytical
No.51902
>>51900No, fuck you. I asked you, now I'm telling you.
No.51903
>>51775>I'm sick of monasteries being almost always being portrayed as unreasonably cruel, petty, and corrupt in both "lowbrow" and "highbrow" media>But people make fun of how comically evil orphanages are in media all the time. Not so much monasteries.am I missing something? these are opposing statements. do people make fun of them in media or not?
>>51777really unique look. wonder how it looks when not professionally lit though
>>51804big sale for big boy
No.51904
>>51902Low motivation. There is little "elegance and understated power" in the quiz results. Merely a collection of snarky office workers and barflies on a spectrum of miserable to idiotic (talmudvision?)
I'll try…
No.51905
>>51903>am I missing something? these are opposing statements. do people make fun of them in media or not?ESL reading comprehension…
People make fun of how orphanages are portrayed, not monasteries. Both of them are portrayed badly. That simple enough for you?
>big sale for big boyI'm hardly big…
No.51906
>>51904>There is little "elegance and understated power"Is that how you view yourself?
>(talmudvision?)What did he mean by this?
No.51907
>>51905>ESL reading comprehension…>People make fun of how orphanages are portrayed, not monasteries. Both of them are portrayed badly. That simple enough for you?ah, oops. you're right. not ESL but that was a blunder; we'll call it even now big boy
No.51908
>>51907Marzipan being gay…
No.51909
>>51906>Is that how you view yourselfNot exactly, but those are traits I admire
No.51910
>>51909>but those are traits I admireO
N
E
E
S
A
N
No.51911
>>51908I call it like I see it
I took the quiz but I know almost none of these characters
No.51912
>>51911>I call it like I see itGay?
>I took the quiz but I know almost none of these characters>Got compatibility as high as the 90%s>They're all soft dork boys No.51915
>>51912>Gay?yeah you keep baiting gay-adjacent humiliation posting, I'm just going with the flow really
>>51912>>Got compatibility as high as the 90%s>They're all soft dork boysI try to give strong answers (leaning more one way or the other, but still trying to be relatively honest) for surveys like this because you get better results, even though in reality there are definitely people farther out than me
maybe it's somewhat accurate though, idk
there's a lot of self-presentation and inner/outer info that doesn't get captured in these questions. the only characters I know from that screenshot are armin arlert and ben wyatt, and I haven't seen either of their respective media in like a decade lol. I was definitely not "literally me"ing with either of them
No.51916
>>51912What does it say that you recognize them
No.51917
>>51914huh, I never got that question! you can't go back after answering a question so it must change paths
Biznasty on your answer, unless you're doing a different quiz
No.51918
>>51915>you keep baiting gay-adjacent humiliation posting, Don't call it that.
>I try to give strong answers (leaning more one way or the other, but still trying to be relatively honest) for surveys like this because you get better results, even though in reality there are definitely people farther out than meThat's called CHEATING and you must retake it because of that.
>>51916>What does it say that you recognize them I have surface-level pop-culture knowledge?
No.51921
>>51920No, it isn't.
No.51922
>>51919scallops are sweet
No.51923
>>51922Scallop my nuts into your mouth.
No.51925
>>51924OBSESSED WITH DISGUYYAHYUH.
No.51926
>>51899>>51902>>51904Here, "full" test version
I still missed out on many of these pick-twos, even if I scored "highly" in them
No.51927
>>51925Disgaea is autistic, cute, creepy, mostly a meta-farce, dabbles in heartfelt moments, and has an undercurrent of lolita perversion
I think it meshes suitably
No.51928
>>51927>I think it meshes suitablyWith what? Your mental baggage?
No.51929
>>51927also those results/victory screen artworks are to die for. too bad they're probably too sketchy/rough of a style to blend in as stickers :(
No.51930
>>51926Certifiably "soft boy" but somehow not "oneesan", you win this time…
No.51931
>>51819I just read this, GOLLUM LMAO
No.51932
>>51931I feel like I was more innocent than either of you…
No.51933
>>51932*honest
Don't know how I made that mistake, frankly, but I don't want to hit myself in the balls.
No.51936
>>51935O wonder!
How many goodly creatures are there here!
How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world
That has such people in't!
No.51937
>>51931>>51819>>51932I assumed that was Ms. Nicholson's results.
Moaning Myrtle?
No.51938
>>51937>I assumed that was Ms. Nicholson's results.(The top lady is a batshit redneck)
>Moaning Myrtle?Don't ask me. That was extra funny because we were making fun of someone the other day for wanting to fuck her when all she did was whine in a bathroom.
No.51941
It's weird but I think it's incredibly hard to get C.AI not to curse with things like "Hell", "damn", or "ass" (I have multiple characters who I said don't curse or use Hell in vain- and C.AI still does it anyway) but incredibly hard to make them say "fuck."
What kind of weird censorship is that shit?
No.51942
>>519391, come what may
No.51943
>>51942Don't respond to yourself.
No.51947
some official full-body art for further consideration.
I can respect both. I think D2's witch has a better outfit; I love the big pleated dress look and the cravat. but for me, she's missing the gloominess of the D1 witch and her mischevious, knowing smirk. that made me miss her for my entire D2 playthrough
unfortunately D1 witch's full-art (picrel #1) is also much weaker
>>51943not me silly
No.51948
>>51947OBSESSED WITH DISGUYYAYYUH.
No.51949
>>51944>from Refrain to GalleriaI haven't played them, are they good?
No.51952
>>51951Shut up, idiot. It's still lewd. I thought they were from the same game.
No.51953
>>51949They're a mixed bag. Refrain presents itself as this complex and tactical dungeon crawl, but works out to be an auto-battler. Galleria is much improved in this regard, but they ran out of budget 40% of the way through the game and spammed RNG dungeons to stitch the remainder of the plot together.
Both are halfway VNs, with 'dark whimsy' and NOSTALGIA coming out of every pore. Harada and Sato put in solid work, as ever.
The writer is rather cruel to his heroines, but that makes you want to work all the harder, heh heh.
I liked them enough to make those two board themes, so I'm a fan. Rec.
No.51954
>>51953Stop bonding…
No.51956
>>51955>by zoomer standards,Don't say that…
Also, Rose? Rose Lalonde?
No.51957
>>51953cool, wrote em down for later!
I still have to finish D4 and play D5 someday…
really not a fan of the 3d models they're using now :( so that might be where I drop the series
>>51954aww, is someone jealous?
>>51955it's just taste but I do prefer the newer designs of what you've shown, both in the way they're rendered and the clothing choices.
>>51944do you think her armpits are exposed underneath her hood? you could just reach up there and poke them No.51958
>>51957>aww, is someone jealous?Yes.
No.51959
>>51957>do you think her armpits are exposed underneath her hood? you could just reach up there and poke them"Yes."
No.51960
>>51958You already know the fastest route to forging an unbreakable "bond" with me, right?
No.51961
>>51960>You already know the fastest route to forging an unbreakable "bond" with me, right?You're not being very empathetic to my problems.
No.51964
>>51963Little late for that.
No.51966
I'm feeling very tired.
And other things. 
I'll get to my ritual posts tomorrow… Probably.
No.51969
>>51965"He used to wear the fat better."
But no, seriously, I don't know why his beard has gotten so patchy. Misguided attempt to shave it and it grew back all weird? Just go back 5 years and he looks much better. Kind of baffling だろ.
No.51970
FUCK I FORGOT AGAIN